Matzura v. Macy's Inc.

S.D. New York

Matzura v. Macy's Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided July 15, 2020·No. 1:19-cv-09926·Unknown

Opinion

BLOB LAA OA □ □□□ DOC#: □ DATE FILED; 7/15/2020 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ee ee ee ee ee ee ee eee ee eee ee ee eee eee eee x STEVEN MATZURA, : On Behalf Of Himself And All Other Persons Similarly Situated, ; Plaintiff, : 19-CV-9926 (ALC) -against- ORDER MACY’S INC., Defendant.

ANDREW L. CARTER, JR., District Judge: The Court is in receipt of the Parties’ response, ECF No. 31, in response to the Court’s June 24, 2020 Order, ECF No. 30. After careful consideration, the Court hereby STAYS this case, and any and all deadlines, pending resolution of the consolidated appeals in Mendez v. AnnTaylor, Inc., No. 19-CV-10625, 2020 WL 1974211 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 24, 2020), appeal filed (No. 20-1550). Defendant’s pending motion to dismiss is DENIED without prejudice to refile the motion after the stay is lifted. The Parties should submit, in writing, a joint status report indicating how they would like to proceed within 14 days of the resolution of the consolidated appeals.

SO ORDERED. Dated: July 15, 2020 New York, New York [Arad 7 (ee

ANDREW L. CARTER, JR. United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BLOB LAA OA □ □□□ DOC#: □ DATE FILED; 7/15/2020 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ee ee ee ee ee ee ee eee ee eee ee ee eee eee eee x STEVEN MATZURA, : On Behalf Of Himself And All Other Persons Similarly Situated, ; Plaintiff, : 19-CV-9926 (ALC) -against- ORDER MACY’S INC., Defendant.

ANDREW L. CARTER, JR., District Judge: The Court is in receipt of the Parties’ response, ECF No. 31, in response to the Court’s June 24, 2020 Order, ECF No. 30. After careful consideration, the Court hereby STAYS this case, and any and all deadlines, pending resolution of the consolidated appeals in Mendez v. AnnTaylor, Inc., No. 19-CV-10625, 2020 WL 1974211 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 24, 2020), appeal filed (No. 20-1550). Defendant’s pending motion to dismiss is DENIED without prejudice to refile the motion after the stay is lifted. The Parties should submit, in writing, a joint status report indicating how they would like to proceed within 14 days of the resolution of the consolidated appeals.

SO ORDERED. Dated: July 15, 2020 New York, New York [Arad 7 (ee

ANDREW L. CARTER, JR. United States District Judge

Matzura v. Macy's Inc., (S.D.N.Y. 2020).

Pincite

Matzura v. Macy's Inc. (Matzura v. Macy's Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.