Matzner v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
This text of Matzner v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Matzner v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Federal Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS Filed: December 27, 2022
* * * * * * * * * * * * * BRUCE MATZNER, * Unpublished * Petitioner, * No. 22-323V * v. * Special Master Gowen * SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Ruling on Entitlement; Concession; AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Guillain-Barré Syndrome. * Respondent. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Jessica A. Wallace, Siri & Glimstad LLP, Aventura, FL, for petitioner. Mallori B. Openchowski, U.S. Dept. of Justice, for respondent.
RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1 On March 24, 2022, Bruce Matzner (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. 2 Petitioner alleges that he suffered from Guillain Barré Syndrome (“GBS”) as a result of receiving the influenza (“flu”) vaccine on September 11, 2020. Petition (ECF No. 1). Petitioner also filed accompanying medical records to support his petition.
On December 26, 2022, respondent filed the Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Report (“Rept.”) (ECF No. 19). Specifically, respondent states that petitioner has satisfied the criteria for GBS set forth in the revised Vaccine Injury Table (“Table”) and the Qualifications and Aids to Interpretation (“QAI”). Rept. at 4. Respondent requested that petitioner submit proof of damages related to his GBS and its related sequelae. Id. at 5. 1 Pursuant to the E-Government Act of 2002, see 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012), because this decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the website of the United States Court of Federal Claims. The court’s website is at http://www.uscfc.uscourts.gov/aggregator/sources/7. This means the decision will be available to anyone with access to the Internet. Before the decision is posted on the court’s website, each party has 14 days to file a motion requesting redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b). “An objecting party must provide the court with a proposed redacted version of the decision.” Id. If neither party files a motion for redaction within 14 days, the decision will be posted on the court’s website without any changes. Id. 2 The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is set forth in Part 2 of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755, codified as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10 to 34 (2012) (hereinafter “Vaccine Act” or “the Act”). Hereinafter, individual section references will be to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa of the Act. In light of respondent’s position and the evidence of the record, I find that petitioner is entitled to compensation. A separate damages order will be issued.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Thomas L. Gowen Thomas L. Gowen Special Master
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Matzner v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matzner-v-secretary-of-health-and-human-services-uscfc-2023.