Matza v. Matza

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Matza v. Matza

614 A.2d 824, 223 Conn. 915, 1992 Conn. LEXIS 309

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedSeptember 17, 1992

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 614 A.2d 824 (Matza v. Matza) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Matza v. Matza, 614 A.2d 824, 223 Conn. 915, 1992 Conn. LEXIS 309 (Colo. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 27 Conn. App. 769, is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Having found that the trial court improperly denied the defendant a hearing before granting her lawyer’s motion to withdraw in the midst of trial, should the Appellate Court have simply ordered a new trial?

Wesley W. Horton and Alexandra Davis, in support of the petition. C. Ian McLachlan, in opposition. Decided September 17, 1992

“2. In a dissolution case, is a challenge to a ruling moot merely because the appellant does not make a general attack on the financial awards?

“3. May the trial court make an adverse inference against a defendant who rests at the end of the plaintiffs case without testifying?

“4. Should the Appellate Court have ruled on the mistrial issue?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI