Matz Vs. Western Progressive-Nev., Inc.
This text of Matz Vs. Western Progressive-Nev., Inc. (Matz Vs. Western Progressive-Nev., Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
JUANITA MATZ, No. 79025 Appellant, vs. WESTERN PROGRESSIVE-NEVADA, INC.; AND OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC, FILED Res • ondents. JUL 2 9 2019 A. BROWN REME COURT - BY DEPUTY CLERK
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is a pro se appeal. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Linda Marie Bell, Judge. Review of the documents submitted to this court pursuant to NRAP 3(g) reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, the notice of appeal identifies an order of the court "to statistically close case." Such an order is not appealable. This court has jurisdiction to consider an appeal only when the appeal is authorized by statute or court rule. Taylor Constr. Co. v. Hilton Hotels, 100 Nev. 207, 678 P.2d 1152 (1984). No statute or court rule permits an appeal from an order statistically closing a case. See Brown v. MHC Stagecoach, LLC, 129 Nev. 343, 301 P.3d 850 (2013) (form orders
ici-311"0 statistically closing a case are not final and appealable). This court lacks jurisdiction, and ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.1
„eaA , J. Hardesty
A4,44.0 J. Stiglich Silver
cc: Hon. Linda Marie Bell, Chief Judge Juanita Matz McCarthy & Holthus, LLP/Las Vegas Eighth District Court Clerk
1Appellant's motion for a stay and request for transcripts are denied as moot. SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A 4WD 2 I
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Matz Vs. Western Progressive-Nev., Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matz-vs-western-progressive-nev-inc-nev-2019.