Matyjasik v. State

969 So. 2d 1142, 2007 WL 3355581
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 14, 2007·No. 4D07-3052·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

969 So.2d 1142 (2007)

Richard MATYJASIK, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D07-3052.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

November 14, 2007.

Richard Matyjasik, Immokalee, pro se.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Heidi L. Bettendorf, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Richard Matyjasik appeals from an order that summarily denied his motion pursuant to rule 3.800(a), Fla. R.Crim. P. (2007). The circuit court did not find that appellant's claim was facially insufficient, nor did it attach records which conclusively refuted the claim. See Sheffield v. State, 903 So.2d 1009, 1011 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005) citing (Anderson v. State, 627 So.2d 1170 (Fla.1993)). We therefore reverse and remand for further proceedings.

SHAHOOD, C.J., FARMER and MAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Matyjasik v. State, 969 So. 2d 1142, 2007 WL 3355581 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

969 So. 2d 1142 (Matyjasik v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Charles v. State
100 So. 3d 1272 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)
Shea v. State
97 So. 3d 861 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)
Fleming v. State
980 So. 2d 1110 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)