Matyjasik v. State
This text of 969 So. 2d 1142 (Matyjasik v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Richard MATYJASIK, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Richard Matyjasik, Immokalee, pro se.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Heidi L. Bettendorf, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Richard Matyjasik appeals from an order that summarily denied his motion pursuant to rule 3.800(a), Fla. R.Crim. P. (2007). The circuit court did not find that appellant's claim was facially insufficient, nor did it attach records which conclusively refuted the claim. See Sheffield v. State, 903 So.2d 1009, 1011 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005) citing (Anderson v. State, 627 So.2d 1170 (Fla.1993)). We therefore reverse and remand for further proceedings.
SHAHOOD, C.J., FARMER and MAY, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
969 So. 2d 1142, 2007 WL 3355581, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matyjasik-v-state-fladistctapp-2007.