Matuszczak v. Kelly

218 S.E.2d 292, 135 Ga. App. 577, 1975 Ga. App. LEXIS 1741
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 2, 1975
Docket50711
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 218 S.E.2d 292 (Matuszczak v. Kelly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matuszczak v. Kelly, 218 S.E.2d 292, 135 Ga. App. 577, 1975 Ga. App. LEXIS 1741 (Ga. Ct. App. 1975).

Opinion

Stolz, Judge.

Appellant and appellee, formerly husband and wife, were divorced in the State of Michigan. As finally amended, the Michigan judgment provided that the appellee (mother) have custody of the minor child of the parties, with the appellant (father) providing support and maintenance payments of $45 per week from January 19,. *578 1970.

The present action was filed by the appellee mother in the Superior Court of Gwinnett County seeking, among other relief, $10,260 for child support in arrears and that the judgment of the Michigan court be made the judgment of the Gwinnett Superior Court. The instant suit with rule nisi was served on the appellant on June 28, 1974. The mother came before the Superior Court of Gwinnett County pursuant to rule nisi on August 16, 1974, more than 45 days after service of the complaint, without the appellant’s having filed any defensive pleadings, but the appellant and his counsel were present. The appellee made a motion for final judgment based on default. The superior court reserved ruling and allowed both counsel the opportunity of filing briefs with the court. Later that day, the appellant filed a petition to open default, an answer, and a motion to dismiss the complaint. Thereafter, on November 14, 1974, the superior court entered judgment declaring the case to be in default, awarding the appellee $10,260 for child support, and making the judgment of the Michigan court the judgment of the Superior Court of Gwinnett County. It is from this judgment that this appeal is taken.

1. Code Ann. § 81A-155 (b) (Ga. L. 1966, pp. 609, 659; 1967, pp. 226, 238) gives the trial court the discretion of opening a default and sets forth the circumstances as to the exercise of that discretion. Generally, this court bes held that, where the trial judge has exercised discretion, this court will not interfere. See United Bonding Ins. Co. v. Bray Lumber Co., 122 Ga. App. 548 (177 SE2d 829); Foster Co. v. Livingston, 127 Ga. App. 317 (193 SE2d 626); Broadaway v. Thompson, 127 Ga. App. 600 (194 SE2d 342); Interstate Life &c. Co. v. Densley, 130 Ga. App. 70 (202 SE2d 463). The record in this case does not reveal any abuse of discretion. The Superior Court of Gwinnett County did not err in ruling the case in default. Enumerations of error 1, 2 and 3 are without merit.

2. The trial judge did not err in entering judgment for the appellee mother in the amount sued for or in making the judgment of the Michigan court its judgment. The claim for money judgment presented a liquidated claim and therefore did not require any proof in this *579 default case, beyond the allegations contained in the complaint. "[T]he plaintiff.. . shall be entitled to verdict and judgment by default, in open court or in chambers, as if every item and paragraph of the petition were supported by proper evidence without the intervention of a jury,...” Code Ann. § 81A-155 (a). Enumerations of error 3, 4 and 5 are without merit.

Submitted May 21, 1975 Decided September 2, 1975. Victoria D. Little, for appellant. James W. Garner, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

Deen, P. J., and Evans, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Klosterman v. Tudor
315 S.E.2d 920 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1984)
Hubert v. Lawson
247 S.E.2d 223 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1978)
SHEET METAL WORKERS INTERNATIONAL ASS'N v. Carter
240 S.E.2d 569 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
218 S.E.2d 292, 135 Ga. App. 577, 1975 Ga. App. LEXIS 1741, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matuszczak-v-kelly-gactapp-1975.