Maturi v. Fay
129 A. 185, 98 N.J. Eq. 377, 13 Stock. 377, 1925 N.J. LEXIS 617
This text of 129 A. 185 (Maturi v. Fay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Maturi v. Fay, 129 A. 185, 98 N.J. Eq. 377, 13 Stock. 377, 1925 N.J. LEXIS 617 (N.J. 1925).
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed by Vice-Chancellor Lewis in the court of chancery.
For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenoi-iard, Parker, Black, Katzbnbaoh, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, Clark, McGlennon, Kays, JJ. 13.
For reversal — -None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Stehr v. Sawyer
180 A.2d 161 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1962)
Robinson-Shore Development Co. v. Gallagher
138 A.2d 726 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1958)
Robinson-Shore Development Co. v. Gallagher
133 A.2d 353 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1957)
DIAL PRESS, INC. v. Phillips
93 A.2d 195 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1952)
Lizak v. Rottenbucher
53 A.2d 362 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1947)
Levy v. Massachusetts Accident Co.
2 A.2d 341 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1938)
Van Buren v. Fine
139 A. 486 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1927)
Foote v. Scarlett
134 A. 865 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1926)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
129 A. 185, 98 N.J. Eq. 377, 13 Stock. 377, 1925 N.J. LEXIS 617, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maturi-v-fay-nj-1925.