Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Matucha v. State

Matucha v. State

125 So. 3d 362, 2013 WL 5988707, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 17918
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 12, 2013
DocketNo. 1D13-3185
StatusPublished

This text of 125 So. 3d 362 (Matucha v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matucha v. State, 125 So. 3d 362, 2013 WL 5988707, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 17918 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Consistent with the state’s concession of error, we conclude that the denial of the right to self representation based on a finding that the defendant is incapable of representing herself requires reversal. Kearse v. State, 858 So.2d 348, 349 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003). Accordingly, the judgment and sentence is reversed and this cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

WETHERELL, SWANSON, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kearse v. State
858 So. 2d 348 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
125 So. 3d 362, 2013 WL 5988707, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 17918, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matucha-v-state-fladistctapp-2013.