Mattson v. New Penn Financial, LLC

District Court, D. Oregon·Decided January 2, 2024·No. 3:18-cv-00990·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

ERIK MATTSON, No. 3:18-cv-00990-YY

Plaintiff, ORDER

v.

NEW PENN FINANCIAL, LLC,

Defendant.

HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge: Magistrate Judge Youlee Yim You issued a Findings and Recommendation on October 12, 2023, in which she recommends that this Court grant Defendant’s Motion to Deny Class Certification. F&R, ECF 115. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Plaintiff filed timely objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings & Recommendation. Pl. Obj., ECF 119. When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate Judge’s Findings & Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge’s report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc). The Court has carefully considered Plaintiff’s objections and concludes that there is no basis to modify the Findings and Recommendation. The Court has also reviewed the pertinent

portions of the record de novo and finds no error in the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation. CONCLUSION The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge You’s Findings and Recommendation, ECF 115. The Court, therefore, GRANTS Defendant’s Motion to Deny Class Certification, ECF 74. IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: ___J_a_n_u_a_r_y_ _2_, _2_0_2_4_______.

_____________________________ MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mattson v. New Penn Financial, LLC, (D. Or. 2024).

Mattson v. New Penn Financial, LLC (Mattson v. New Penn Financial, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dawson v. Marshall
561 F.3d 930 (Ninth Circuit, 2009)