Mattos v. State
560 So. 2d 261, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2221, 1990 WL 37406
Opinion
A petitioner is not entitled to relief from a judgment of conviction on a writ of cor-am nobis where the facts upon which the petition is based were known to the petitioner when the judgment was entered. Smith v. State, 400 So.2d 956 (Fla.1981); Hallman v. State, 371 So.2d 482 (Fla.1979); State v. Brick, 490 So.2d 1330 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. denied, 496 So.2d 142 (Fla.1986).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mattos v. State, 560 So. 2d 261, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2221, 1990 WL 37406 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).
560 So. 2d 261 (Mattos v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Smith v. State
400 So. 2d 956 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1981)
Hallman v. State
371 So. 2d 482 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1979)
State v. Brick
490 So. 2d 1330 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)