Mattos v. State
560 So. 2d 261, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2221, 1990 WL 37406
This text of 560 So. 2d 261 (Mattos v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Mattos v. State, 560 So. 2d 261, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2221, 1990 WL 37406 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).
Opinion
A petitioner is not entitled to relief from a judgment of conviction on a writ of cor-am nobis where the facts upon which the petition is based were known to the petitioner when the judgment was entered. Smith v. State, 400 So.2d 956 (Fla.1981); Hallman v. State, 371 So.2d 482 (Fla.1979); State v. Brick, 490 So.2d 1330 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. denied, 496 So.2d 142 (Fla.1986).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Smith v. State
400 So. 2d 956 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1981)
Hallman v. State
371 So. 2d 482 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1979)
State v. Brick
490 So. 2d 1330 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
560 So. 2d 261, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2221, 1990 WL 37406, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mattos-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.