Mattos v. Agarano

661 F.3d 433
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided October 4, 2010·No. 08-15567·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

625 F.3d 1132 (2010)

Troy MATTOS; Jayzel Mattos, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
Darren AGARANO; Ryan Aikala Stuart Kunioka; Halayudha MacKnight, Defendants-Appellants, and
Maui County, Defendant.

No. 08-15567.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

October 4, 2010.

Eric A. Seitz, Esquire, Lawrence I. Kawasaki, Esquire, Law Office of Eric A. Seitz, Della Au Belatti, Honolulu, HI, for Plaintiffs-Appellees.

Moana Monique Lutey, Deputy Corporation Counsel, Department of the Corporation Counsel, Wailuku, HI, for Defendants-Appellants.

Prior report: 590 F.3d 1082.

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mattos v. Agarano, 661 F.3d 433 (9th Cir. 2010).

661 F.3d 433 (Mattos v. Agarano) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Untitled Case
D. New Mexico, 2026
Jones v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department
873 F.3d 1123 (Ninth Circuit, 2017)
Marie Sales v. City of Tustin
649 F. App'x 615 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)
Brian Patterson v. City of Akron, Ohio
619 F. App'x 462 (Sixth Circuit, 2015)
Richard Collender v. Shawn Neel
605 F. App'x 624 (Ninth Circuit, 2015)
Donald Gravelet-Blondin v. Sgt Jeff Shelton
728 F.3d 1086 (Ninth Circuit, 2013)