Mattoon & Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Mattoon & Co. v. United States

58 Cust. Ct. 865, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1963

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedFebruary 20, 1967

DocketNo. P67/38; protest 64/782 (San Francisco)

StatusPublished

This text of 58 Cust. Ct. 865 (Mattoon & Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mattoon & Co. v. United States, 58 Cust. Ct. 865, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1963 (cusc 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of Yon Arx air guns [866]*866and parts similar in all material respects to those the subject of Mattoon & Company and T. G. Cullen v. United States (54 Cust. Ct. 282, C.D. 2545), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

(Note: The following protests were decided by a special second division consisting of Rao, FoRd, and Richardson, Judges.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of Yon Arx air guns [866]*866and parts similar in all material respects to those the subject of Mattoon & Company and T. G. Cullen v. United States (54 Cust. Ct. 282, C.D. 2545), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

(Note: The following protests were decided by a special second division consisting of Rao, FoRd, and Richardson, Judges.)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

58 Cust. Ct. 865, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1963, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mattoon-co-v-united-states-cusc-1967.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack