Mattoon & Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Mattoon & Co. v. United States

58 Cust. Ct. 865, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1963

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mattoon & Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 62 Cust. Ct. 291 →

United States Customs Court·Decided February 20, 1967·No. No. P67/38; protest 64/782 (San Francisco)·Published

Opinion

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of Yon Arx air guns [866]*866and parts similar in all material respects to those the subject of Mattoon & Company and T. G. Cullen v. United States (54 Cust. Ct. 282, C.D. 2545), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

(Note: The following protests were decided by a special second division consisting of Rao, FoRd, and Richardson, Judges.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of Yon Arx air guns [866]*866and parts similar in all material respects to those the subject of Mattoon & Company and T. G. Cullen v. United States (54 Cust. Ct. 282, C.D. 2545), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

(Note: The following protests were decided by a special second division consisting of Rao, FoRd, and Richardson, Judges.)

Mattoon & Co. v. United States, 58 Cust. Ct. 865, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1963 (cusc 1967).

Pincite

58 Cust. Ct. 865 (Mattoon & Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related