Mattison v. State of New York
Opinion
| Mattison v State of New York |
| 2026 NY Slip Op 00702 |
| Decided on February 11, 2026 |
| Appellate Division, Fourth Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on February 11, 2026 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: CURRAN, J.P., BANNISTER, OGDEN, DELCONTE, AND HANNAH, JJ.
791 CA 24-00607
v
STATE OF NEW YORK AND NEW YORK STATE THRUWAY AUTHORITY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. (APPEAL NO. 1.)
CELLINO LAW LLP, BUFFALO (GREGORY V. PAJAK OF COUNSEL), FOR CLAIMANTS-APPELLANTS.
LETITIA JAMES, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (JONATHAN D. HITSOUS OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Appeal from an order of the Court of Claims (J. David Sampson, J.), entered March 14, 2024. The order denied the application of claimants seeking, in effect, permission to file a late claim.
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is dismissed without costs.
Same memorandum as in Mattison v State of New York ([appeal No. 2] — AD3d — [Feb. 11, 2026] [4th Dept 2026]).
All concur except Curran and Hannah, JJ., who dissent and vote to affirm in the same dissenting memorandum as in Mattison v State of New York ([appeal No. 2] — AD3d — [Feb. 11, 2026] [4th Dept 2026]).
Entered: February 11, 2026
Ann Dillon Flynn
Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2026 NY Slip Op 00702 (Mattison v. State of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.