Mattis v. Virginia

Fourth Circuit

Mattis v. Virginia

120 F. App'x 435

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 1, 2005

DocketNo. 04-2124

StatusPublished

This text of 120 F. App'x 435 (Mattis v. Virginia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mattis v. Virginia, 120 F. App'x 435 (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Gary Kevin Mattis appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action. Our review of the record and the district court’s opinion discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Mattis v. Virginia, No. CA-03-75 (N.D.W.Va. Mar. 29, 2004). We deny Mattis’ motion to strike and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Gary Kevin Mattis appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action. Our review of the record and the district court’s opinion discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Mattis v. Virginia, No. CA-03-75 (N.D.W.Va. Mar. 29, 2004). We deny Mattis’ motion to strike and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

120 F. App'x 435, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mattis-v-virginia-ca4-2005.