Home/Ohio Court of Appeals/Mattis v. Vancil

Mattis v. Vancil

88 N.E.2d 79, 85 Ohio App. 509, 54 Ohio Law. Abs. 496, 40 Ohio Op. 414, 1949 Ohio App. LEXIS 722
CourtOhio Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 2, 1949
Docket2043
StatusPublished

This text of 88 N.E.2d 79 (Mattis v. Vancil) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mattis v. Vancil, 88 N.E.2d 79, 85 Ohio App. 509, 54 Ohio Law. Abs. 496, 40 Ohio Op. 414, 1949 Ohio App. LEXIS 722 (Ohio Ct. App. 1949).

Opinion

OPINION

By THE COURT:

Submitted on motion of plaintiff-appellee to dismiss the appeal on questions of law and fact on the ground that it is not a chancery action. An examination of the record discloses that this is a civil action for the recovery of money only. The motion to dismiss the appeal on questions of law and fact will be sustained. The case will be retained as an appeal on questions of law.

The court orders a bill of exceptions, assignments of error and briefs to be filed in conformity to the provisions of Supplement to Rule VII.

Counsel will draw the proper entry.

MILLER, PJ, HORNBECK and WISEMAN, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
88 N.E.2d 79, 85 Ohio App. 509, 54 Ohio Law. Abs. 496, 40 Ohio Op. 414, 1949 Ohio App. LEXIS 722, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mattis-v-vancil-ohioctapp-1949.