Mattis v. Connolly
63 N.W. 918, 45 Neb. 628, 1895 Neb. LEXIS 247
Opinion
In this case the bill of exceptions was signed by the clerk upon a stipulation that he should settle and allow it. There was, however, no agreement upon the bill of exceptions, and following Scott v. Spencer, 42 Neb., 637, we cannot treat it as such. We find that the briefs of counsel, upon which, without oral argument, this cause was submitted, discuss only questions of fact. These we cannot advisedly consider, and the judgment of the district court is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mattis v. Connolly, 63 N.W. 918, 45 Neb. 628, 1895 Neb. LEXIS 247 (Neb. 1895).
63 N.W. 918 (Mattis v. Connolly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Hyatt
67 N.W. 8 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1896)