Mattingly v. News Syndicate Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Mattingly v. News Syndicate Co.

277 A.D.2d 842

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 6, 1950

StatusPublished

This text of 277 A.D.2d 842 (Mattingly v. News Syndicate Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mattingly v. News Syndicate Co., 277 A.D.2d 842 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1950).

Pincite

Opinion

Order affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Van Voorhis, JJ.; Cohn, J., dissents in the following memorandum: The complaint should not have been dismissed for legal insufficiency. As to whether the challenged a'rticle is libelous is a question of fact for a jury. The order dismissing the complaint should be reversed. [192 Misc. 610.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Van Voorhis, JJ.; Cohn, J., dissents in the following memorandum: The complaint should not have been dismissed for legal insufficiency. As to whether the challenged a'rticle is libelous is a question of fact for a jury. The order dismissing the complaint should be reversed. [192 Misc. 610.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

277 A.D.2d 842, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mattingly-v-news-syndicate-co-nyappdiv-1950.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack