Mattingly v. News Syndicate Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Mattingly v. News Syndicate Co.

277 A.D.2d 842

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 6, 1950·Published

Opinion

Order affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Van Voorhis, JJ.; Cohn, J., dissents in the following memorandum: The complaint should not have been dismissed for legal insufficiency. As to whether the challenged a'rticle is libelous is a question of fact for a jury. The order dismissing the complaint should be reversed. [192 Misc. 610.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Van Voorhis, JJ.; Cohn, J., dissents in the following memorandum: The complaint should not have been dismissed for legal insufficiency. As to whether the challenged a'rticle is libelous is a question of fact for a jury. The order dismissing the complaint should be reversed. [192 Misc. 610.]

Mattingly v. News Syndicate Co., 277 A.D.2d 842 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1950).

Pincite

277 A.D.2d 842 (Mattingly v. News Syndicate Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related