Mattingly v. Lancaster
This text of 9 Ky. 30 (Mattingly v. Lancaster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
This is an an appeal from a judgment of restitution, rendered by the circuit court, in favor of Lancaster, on the trial of a traverse taken to the inquisition of a jury had before a justice of the peace, under a warrant for a forcible detainer, against Mattingly and Smith.
The appellants having denied that they entered the premises as tenants to the appellee, or those under whom he claims; and the appellee failing to prove they obtained the possession either as tenants to him, or any other under whom he claims, the court should have instructed the jury to find for the appellants.
But having refused to give such instructions, the judgment must be reversed with cost, the cause remanded, and further proceedings had not inconsistent with this opinion.
Absent, Judge Rowan.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
9 Ky. 30, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mattingly-v-lancaster-kyctapp-1819.