Mattier v. State

711 So. 2d 256, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 8845, 1998 WL 281334
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 3, 1998·No. No. 97-1862·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Appellant’s conviction of first-degree murder. We find no error in the trial court’s denial of Appellant’s request for a special jury instruction on the crime of manslaughter by unnecessary killing to prevent an unlawful act. See § 782.11, Fla. Stat. (1997). The standard jury instructions on self-defense given here adequately covered an unnecessary killing under a claim of self-defense. See State v. Carrizales, 356 So.2d 274 (Fla.1978). A special instruction on unnecessary killing should be given only where a victim was attempting to commit a felony or other unlawful act independent of an unlawful act directed solely at the defendant. Cf. State v. Kadet, 455 So.2d 389 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984). As to the other issue raised, we find any error harmless.

STONE, C.J., and FARMER and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mattier v. State, 711 So. 2d 256, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 8845, 1998 WL 281334 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

711 So. 2d 256 (Mattier v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Medina v. State
711 So. 2d 256 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)