Mattie Jones, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Albin Jones v. Harris County, Phillips Edison Grocery Center Operating Partnership I, L. P., and Virgata Property Company, LLC

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 8, 2022
Docket01-20-00700-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Mattie Jones, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Albin Jones v. Harris County, Phillips Edison Grocery Center Operating Partnership I, L. P., and Virgata Property Company, LLC (Mattie Jones, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Albin Jones v. Harris County, Phillips Edison Grocery Center Operating Partnership I, L. P., and Virgata Property Company, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mattie Jones, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Albin Jones v. Harris County, Phillips Edison Grocery Center Operating Partnership I, L. P., and Virgata Property Company, LLC, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Mattie Jones, individually and as representative of the Estate of Albin Jones, deceased v. Harris County, Phillips Edison Grocery Center Operating Partnership I, L. P., and Virgata Property Company, LLC

Appellate case number: 01-20-00700-CV

Trial court case number: 2020-48838

Trial court: 164th District Court of Harris County

This case has been reset for in person oral argument on Tuesday, April 19, 2022 at 1:30 p.m. The parties are instructed to be prepared to discuss the application of the Texas Tort Claims Act’s discretionary function exception at oral argument. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE § 101.056. Appellant contends the TTCA’s discretionary function exception does not apply in this case because various laws and regulations required Appellee to install a curb ramp at the intersection of Oakwood Glen Boulevard and Stuebner Airline Road (the “Subject Intersection”); however, neither party has addressed in its briefing the actual text of the various laws and regulations or their application given the conditions at the Subject Intersection. The parties should be prepared to discuss the text, applicability, and interpretation of the various laws and regulations at oral argument. In addition, the parties should expect to address the remainder of the legal arguments presented in their respective briefs. The parties are invited to file supplemental briefing on the identified issue in advance of oral argument. Appellant’s supplemental brief, if any, shall be filed no later than Monday, April 4, 2022. Appellee’s response to appellant’s supplemental brief, if any, shall be filed no later than Monday, April 11, 2022. The supplemental briefing should be limited to the identified issue and may not, without leave of court, be longer than 6,500 words if computer-generated and 20 pages if not. It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Amparo Guerra  Acting individually  Acting for the Court Date: March 8, 2022_____________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 101.056
Texas CP § 101.056

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Mattie Jones, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Albin Jones v. Harris County, Phillips Edison Grocery Center Operating Partnership I, L. P., and Virgata Property Company, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mattie-jones-individually-and-as-representative-of-the-estate-of-albin-texapp-2022.