Matthison v. Payne

122 A. 926, 99 N.J.L. 285, 14 Gummere 285, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 206
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Matthison v. Payne. Read the opinion of the Court — 98 N.J.L. 87
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided October 5, 1923·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Kaliseh in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenchard, Bergen, Minturn, Black, Katzenbacii, White, Heppenheimer, Ackerson, Van Buskirk, JJ. 10.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Matthison v. Payne, 122 A. 926, 99 N.J.L. 285, 14 Gummere 285, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 206 (N.J. 1923).

122 A. 926 (Matthison v. Payne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.