Matthiessen v. Orchidwood, Inc.
240 A.D. 947
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 15, 1933·Published
Opinions
Order reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted in so far as to direct that defendant be required to pay the amount due as fixed by [948]*948the stipulation -within ten days after service of order. Otherwise, order affirmed. (See Van Nuys v. Titsworth, 57 Hun, 5, and Humphries v. Shapiro,\187 App. Div. 96.) Settle order on notice. Present — Finch, P. J., Merrell, Martin, O’Malley and Townley, JJ.; Finch, P. J., and Merrell, J., dissent and vote for affirmance.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Matthiessen v. Orchidwood, Inc., 240 A.D. 947 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).
240 A.D. 947 (Matthiessen v. Orchidwood, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Yonkers Fur Dressing Co. v. Royal Insurance
160 N.E. 778 (New York Court of Appeals, 1928)
Humphries v. Shapiro
187 A.D. 96 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1919)
Van Nuys v. Fitsworth
10 N.Y.S. 507 (New York Supreme Court, 1890)