Matthiessen v. Orchidwood, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Matthiessen v. Orchidwood, Inc.

240 A.D. 947

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 15, 1933

StatusPublished

This text of 240 A.D. 947 (Matthiessen v. Orchidwood, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Matthiessen v. Orchidwood, Inc., 240 A.D. 947 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

Opinions

Order reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted in so far as to direct that defendant be required to pay the amount due as fixed by [948]*948the stipulation -within ten days after service of order. Otherwise, order affirmed. (See Van Nuys v. Titsworth, 57 Hun, 5, and Humphries v. Shapiro,\187 App. Div. 96.) Settle order on notice. Present — Finch, P. J., Merrell, Martin, O’Malley and Townley, JJ.; Finch, P. J., and Merrell, J., dissent and vote for affirmance.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted in so far as to direct that defendant be required to pay the amount due as fixed by [948]*948the stipulation -within ten days after service of order. Otherwise, order affirmed. (See Van Nuys v. Titsworth, 57 Hun, 5, and Humphries v. Shapiro,\187 App. Div. 96.) Settle order on notice. Present — Finch, P. J., Merrell, Martin, O’Malley and Townley, JJ.; Finch, P. J., and Merrell, J., dissent and vote for affirmance.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

240 A.D. 947, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matthiessen-v-orchidwood-inc-nyappdiv-1933.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack