Matthews v. World Omni Financial Corp.

118 B.R. 398
CourtDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina
DecidedAugust 11, 1989
DocketBankruptcy No. 89-00947; Adv. No. 89-8075
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 118 B.R. 398 (Matthews v. World Omni Financial Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matthews v. World Omni Financial Corp., 118 B.R. 398 (southcarolinaed 1989).

Opinion

ORDER

WILLIAM THURMOND BISHOP, Bankruptcy Judge.

Before the court is the adversary complaint of the debtor, Sheila G. Matthews, for the turnover of a 1986 Toyota Corolla held by the creditor, World Omni Finance Corporation (World Omni). The debtor claims that it is entitled to possession of the automobile pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 542(a).1'2 World Omni asserts that the automobile is of inconsequential value to the estate, therefore not subject to turnover. World Omni further asserts that the automobile is not property of the estate pursuant to § 541.3

FINDINGS OF FACT

The debtor and World Omni entered into a purchase money security agreement for the purchase of a 1986 Toyota Corolla on July 9, 1988. On March 6, 1989, World Omni repossessed the automobile due to the debtor’s failure to make payments. The debtor filed her Chapter 13 petition for relief on March 15, 1989. The automobile had not been sold prior to the filing of the petition. It remains in the possession of World Omni.

The debtor owns no other vehicle and needs this automobile for transportation to and from work.

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

The debtor contends that she has an interest in the automobile sufficient to [399]*399allow its recovery from the creditor as property of the estate. The debtor relies upon the fact that the automobile has not yet been sold in a commercially reasonable manner and her statutory right of redemption still exists4. As In re Anderson, 29 B.R. 563 (Bankr.E.D.Va.1983) states:

“The debtor’s right of redemption is clearly within the purview of this section and is property of the estate which a bankruptcy court may compel an entity in possession to turn over.

“An equity of redemption comes within the scope of ‘all legal or equitable interests of the debtor in property’ and as such becomes property of the estate pursuant to section 541(a)(1).” (citations omitted) 4 Collier on Bankruptcy Para. 541.07[3] (15th ed. 1989).

The leading case on this issue is United States v. Whiting Pools, 462 U.S. 198, 103 S.Ct. 2309, 76 L.Ed.2d 515 (1983), which states:

The House and Senate Reports on the Bankruptcy Code indicate that § 541(a)(l)’s scope is broad (footnote omitted). Most important, in the context of this case, § 541(a)(1) is intended to include in the estate any property made available to the estate by other provisions of the Bankruptcy Code. See HR Rep No. 95-595, p 367 (1977). Several of these provisions bring into the estate property in which the debtor did not have a possessory interest at the time the bankruptcy proceedings commenced (footnote omitted). Section 542(a) is such a provision. It requires an entity (other than a custodian) holding any property of the debtor that the trustee can use under § 363 to turn that property over to the trustee (footnote omitted). Given the broad scope of the reorganization estate, property of the debtor repossessed by a secured creditor falls within this rule, and therefore may be drawn into the estate.... In effect, § 542(a) grants to the estate a possessory interest in certain property of the debtor that was not held by the debtor at the commencement of reorganization proceedings (footnote omitted). The Bankruptcy Code provides secured creditors various rights, including the right to adequate protection, and these rights replace the protection afforded by possession.

United States v. Whiting Pools at 205-07, 103 S.Ct. at 2313-15.

This court holds that the 1986 Toyota Corolla is property of the estate and is of significant use value to the estate by providing the debtor with transportation to and from work. It is necessary for a successful plan of reorganization for the creditor to turn over the automobile to the debt- or.

THEREFORE, IT IS,

ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED, that World Omni Financial Corporation shall turn over the 1986 Toyota Corolla to the debtor upon the showing of proof of insurance by the debtor. The debtor is directed to maintain adequate insurance on the vehicle.

World Omni Financial Corporation is directed to pay attorney’s fees in the amount of $250.00 to the debtor’s attorney within 30 days of the date of this order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Matthews
118 B.R. 398 (D. South Carolina, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
118 B.R. 398, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matthews-v-world-omni-financial-corp-southcarolinaed-1989.