Matthews v. Warden, Nevada State Prison

530 P.2d 760, 91 Nev. 7, 1975 Nev. LEXIS 526
CourtNevada Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 16, 1975
DocketNo. 7624
StatusPublished

This text of 530 P.2d 760 (Matthews v. Warden, Nevada State Prison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matthews v. Warden, Nevada State Prison, 530 P.2d 760, 91 Nev. 7, 1975 Nev. LEXIS 526 (Neb. 1975).

Opinion

[8]*8OPINION

Per Curiam:

Matthews, who had pleaded guilty to the charge of uttering a forged instrument, appeals from an order denying his second petition for post-conviction relief premised on the contention that his guilty plea was involuntarily entered. Since his first post-conviction petition did not challenge the voluntariness of his plea, and since his second petition did not explain why he had previously failed to assert such challenge, the district court denied relief. This was permissible. Rogers v. Warden, 86 Nev. 359, 468 P.2d 993 (1970); Johnson v. Warden, 89 Nev. 476, 515 P.2d 63 (1973).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rogers v. Warden, Nevada State Prison
468 P.2d 993 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1970)
Johnson v. Warden, Nevada State Prison
515 P.2d 63 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
530 P.2d 760, 91 Nev. 7, 1975 Nev. LEXIS 526, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matthews-v-warden-nevada-state-prison-nev-1975.