Matthews v. United States

Fourth Circuit

Matthews v. United States

604 F. App'x 283

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 22, 2015·No. No. 15-6132·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Alexander Matthews appeals the district court’s order granting the United States’ motion to dismiss his Federal Tort Claims Act suit for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Matthews v. United States, No. 1:12-cv-01473-LO-TCB (E.D.Va. Jan. 13, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this [284] court and argument would not aid' the’ decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Alexander Matthews appeals the district court’s order granting the United States’ motion to dismiss his Federal Tort Claims Act suit for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Matthews v. United States, No. 1:12-cv-01473-LO-TCB (E.D.Va. Jan. 13, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this [284] court and argument would not aid' the’ decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Matthews v. United States, 604 F. App'x 283 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

604 F. App'x 283 (Matthews v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.