Matthews v. Talcon, Inc.
170 F. App'x 637
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedMarch 8, 2006
DocketNo. 05-10528; D.C. Docket No. 03-00325-CV-FTM-33-DNF
StatusPublished
This text of 170 F. App'x 637 (Matthews v. Talcon, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Matthews v. Talcon, Inc., 170 F. App'x 637 (11th Cir. 2006).
Opinion
Under the particular circumstances of this case, we cannot conclude that the attorney’s signature on the charge is sufficient; nor can we conclude that this potentially technical deficiency has been cured in this case.
Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
170 F. App'x 637, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matthews-v-talcon-inc-ca11-2006.