Matthews v. State
This text of 70 S.E. 1110 (Matthews v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The great weight of the evidence introduced by the State, if credible, tended to show that the accused was guilty of murder; the statement •' of the accused, who introduced no evidence, made to the jury, tended, if worthy of credit, to show that the homicide was justifiable; the jury could have found from some of the evidence for the State, considered ,in connection with a portion of the statement of the accused to the jury, that the accused and the deceased, while engaged in an angry altercation, both drew weapons, the former a pistol the latter a knife, and each willing and intending to fight, in hot blood and without malice, endeavored to use his weapon, on the other, and that the deceased was killed in such rencounter. It follows, therefore, that the court erred in not defining the offense of voluntary manslaughter, and in not instructing the jury as to the law of that grade of homi[126]*126cide applicable to mutual combat, as- presented by a timely written request on the part of the accused.
2. The other requests to charge, in so far as they were legal and applicable, were fully covered by the instructions given.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
70 S.E. 1110, 136 Ga. 125, 1911 Ga. LEXIS 436, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matthews-v-state-ga-1911.