Matthews v. State
52 So. 3d 844, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 1523, 2011 WL 409000
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Matthews v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 17655 →
Opinion
The State concedes that appellant’s letter should have been treated as a motion to correct a scrivener’s error in court documents. This matter is reversed and remanded. Wells v. State, 796 So.2d 1276 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001).
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Matthews v. State, 52 So. 3d 844, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 1523, 2011 WL 409000 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).
52 So. 3d 844 (Matthews v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wells v. State
796 So. 2d 1276 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)