Matthews v. State
Opinion
Matthews appeals from an order summarily denying his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. Appellant alleged in his motion that he received ineffective assistance of counsel in that his plea was coerced as a result of misinformation provided by his attorney concerning [26] the length of time he would spend in prison. There was no specific allegation that had counsel given him the correct information, he would not have entered the plea. Without this allegation, the petition was deficient. Thompson v. State, 599 So.2d 244 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992).
Since appellant may be able to properly allege reliance on the advice of counsel, our affirmance is without prejudice to appellant pursuing a subsequent 3.850 motion on the grounds of ineffective trial counsel as a result of counsel’s alleged misrepresentations. Marsh v. State, 581 So.2d 653 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991).1
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
614 So. 2d 25 (Matthews v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.