Matthews v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Matthews v. State

466 So. 2d 1234, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 944, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13433

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 10, 1985

DocketNo. 84-2436

StatusPublished

This text of 466 So. 2d 1234 (Matthews v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Matthews v. State, 466 So. 2d 1234, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 944, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13433 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

John Daniel Matthews was found not guilty by reason of insanity of the charge of grand theft. The trial judge committed him to the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, who placed him in Florida State Hospital at Chattahoochee. Matthews now appeals the trial court’s continuation of his involuntary hospitalization. We hold that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying appellant’s release. Appellant failed to carry his burden of proof that, if released, he would be unlikely to injure himself or others. Hill v. State, 358 So.2d 190 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). Accordingly, the order appealed from is affirmed.

RYDER, C.J., and CAMPBELL and FRANK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

John Daniel Matthews was found not guilty by reason of insanity of the charge of grand theft. The trial judge committed him to the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, who placed him in Florida State Hospital at Chattahoochee. Matthews now appeals the trial court’s continuation of his involuntary hospitalization. We hold that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying appellant’s release. Appellant failed to carry his burden of proof that, if released, he would be unlikely to injure himself or others. Hill v. State, 358 So.2d 190 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). Accordingly, the order appealed from is affirmed.

RYDER, C.J., and CAMPBELL and FRANK, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

466 So. 2d 1234, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 944, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13433, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matthews-v-state-fladistctapp-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack