Matthews v. State ex rel. Department of Corrections

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Matthews v. State ex rel. Department of Corrections

345 So. 2d 1232, 1977 La. App. LEXIS 4513

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedMay 9, 1977

DocketNo. 11269

StatusPublished

This text of 345 So. 2d 1232 (Matthews v. State ex rel. Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Matthews v. State ex rel. Department of Corrections, 345 So. 2d 1232, 1977 La. App. LEXIS 4513 (La. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

SARTAIN, Judge.

This is an appeal by the State from a judgment in favor of plaintiff, Robert Matthews, for $6.40, representing the value of sixteen packages of cigarettes.

We find that the trial judge erred as a matter of law in imposing liability on the State without a showing that the loss was the result of specific acts of sub-standard conduct on the part of an agent or employee of the State. The State’s liability is vicarious and such a showing is essential. Little v. Caterpillar Tractor Company, 169 So.2d 654 (La.App. 1st Cir. 1964); Moreau v. Landry, 305 So.2d 671 (La.App. 1st Cir. 1974); C.C. Art. 2320.

In the interest of time and economy, the trial judge declined to subpoena some eight witnesses requested by the plaintiff. Presumably, plaintiff intended to establish a connexite between the loss complained of and negligent conduct of a state employee. The matter is remanded for this purpose.

In all other respects, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

All such costs as relate to this appeal and are permitted by law are assessed against the State. All other costs are to await a final determination on the merits.

REVERSED IN PART, AFFIRMED IN PART, AND REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI