Matthews v. Spalding
This text of 534 U.S. 809 (Matthews v. Spalding) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[809]*809C. A. 9th Cir.;
C. A. 9th Cir.;
Ct. Civ. App. Ala.;
Ct. App. D. G;
C. A. 5th Cir.;
C. A. 2d Cir.;
C. A. 6th Cir.;
App. Ct. Ill., 4th Dist.;
C. A. 11th Cir.;
C. A. Fed. Cir.;
Super. Ct. N. J., App. Div.; and
C. A. 11th Cir. Motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioners are allowed until October 22, 2001, wilhin which to pay the docketing fees required by Rule 38(a) and to submit petitions in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
534 U.S. 809, 122 S. Ct. 30, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matthews-v-spalding-scotus-2001.