Matthews v. Spalding

534 U.S. 809, 122 S. Ct. 30
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 1, 2001
DocketNo. 00-9939; No. 00-10003; No. 00-10139; No. 00-10391; No. 00-10445; No. 00-10458; No. 00-10710; No. 01-5359; No. 01-5413; No. 01-5533; No. 01-5756; No. 01-5999
StatusPublished

This text of 534 U.S. 809 (Matthews v. Spalding) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matthews v. Spalding, 534 U.S. 809, 122 S. Ct. 30 (2001).

Opinion

[809]*809C. A. 9th Cir.;

C. A. 9th Cir.;

[810]*810No. 00-10139. No. 00-10391. No. 00-10445. No. 00-10458. No. 00-10710. No. 01-5359. No. 01-5413. No. 01-5533. No. 01-5756. No. 01-5999.

Ct. Civ. App. Ala.;

Ct. App. D. G;

C. A. 5th Cir.;

C. A. 2d Cir.;
C. A. 6th Cir.;

App. Ct. Ill., 4th Dist.;

C. A. 11th Cir.;
C. A. Fed. Cir.;

Super. Ct. N. J., App. Div.; and

C. A. 11th Cir. Motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioners are allowed until October 22, 2001, wilhin which to pay the docketing fees required by Rule 38(a) and to submit petitions in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
534 U.S. 809, 122 S. Ct. 30, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matthews-v-spalding-scotus-2001.