Home/Ohio Court of Appeals/Matthews v. Russell

Matthews v. Russell

105 N.E.2d 65, 61 Ohio Law. Abs. 441, 1950 Ohio App. LEXIS 915
CourtOhio Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 17, 1950
DocketNo. 2072
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 105 N.E.2d 65 (Matthews v. Russell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matthews v. Russell, 105 N.E.2d 65, 61 Ohio Law. Abs. 441, 1950 Ohio App. LEXIS 915 (Ohio Ct. App. 1950).

Opinion

OPINION

By THE COURT:

[442]*442[441]*441This is a motion to certify this cause for the reason that the decision is in conflict with 31 Oh Ap 307, Brannon v. City of Wilmington. We recognize the conflict, but since the decision in the cited case the Supreme Court has announced [442]*442the rule of law applicable in the case of Village of Struthers v. Sokol, 108 Oh St 263, which we followed. After the Supreme Court has established the rule of law, any such conflict with a decision of another Court of Appeals is of no consequence. Whipp v. Industrial Commission, 136 Oh St 531.

The motion will be overruled.

MILLER, PJ, HORNBECK and WISEMAN, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Miazga v. International Union of Operating Engineers
200 N.E.2d 645 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1964)
White v. Industrial Commission
149 N.E.2d 40 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1957)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
105 N.E.2d 65, 61 Ohio Law. Abs. 441, 1950 Ohio App. LEXIS 915, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matthews-v-russell-ohioctapp-1950.