Matthews v. Reubart
Opinion
2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 IVAN LEE MATTHEWS, Case No. 3:19-CV-0221-MMD-CLB 7 Plaintiff, ORDER 8 V. 9} WILLIAM REUBART, 10 Defendant. 11 $$ 12 On June 1, 2021, defendants filed a motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 12). 13 | Plaintiff was given notice of the motion pursuant to the requirements of Kiingele v. 14| Ejikenberry, 849 F.2d 409 (9" Cir. 1988), and Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952 (9"" Cir. 15 | 1998) (ECF No. 16). To date, plaintiff has failed to file an opposition. 16 The court will sua sponte grant plaintiff one final extension of time to Monday, July 19, 2021 to file an opposition to the motion for summary judgment. No further extensions of time shall be granted. If plaintiff fails to file an opposition, the motion will 19 | be submitted to the court for decision. 20 IT |S SO ORDERED. 21 DATED: _ July 6, 2021 * 22 74 UNITED ani JUDGE 24 25 26 27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Matthews v. Reubart (Matthews v. Reubart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.