Matthews v. M.C. Dean, Inc.
This text of 452 F. App'x 297 (Matthews v. M.C. Dean, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[298]*298Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Erma J. Matthews appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of her former employer. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court at the summary judgment hearing. MATTHEWS v. M.C. DEAN, INC., No. 1:09-cv-00622-LMB-TRJ, 2010 WL 2323674 (E.D.Va. Mar. 12, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
452 F. App'x 297, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matthews-v-mc-dean-inc-ca4-2011.