Matthews v. Matthews

189 So. 2d 629, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3205
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedApril 20, 1966
DocketNo. 34625
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 189 So. 2d 629 (Matthews v. Matthews) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matthews v. Matthews, 189 So. 2d 629, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3205 (Fla. 1966).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have heard oral argument on the petition for certiorari to review a decision of the Court of Appeal, Second District, 177 So.2d 497, because of apparent jurisdiction in this court.

After oral argument and a careful study of the record and briefs, we conclude this: court is without jurisdiction in the matter because of lack of a direct conflict as required by the Constitution, Article V, Section 4, F.S.A.

The writ is discharged.

"THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, O’CONNELL, CALDWELL and BARNS-PAUL D., (Retired), JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mackle v. Mackle
389 So. 2d 1081 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
189 So. 2d 629, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3205, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matthews-v-matthews-fla-1966.