Matthews v. Lyall

16 F. Cas. 1113, 6 McLean 13
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Michigan·Decided June 15, 1853·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

The defendant being an alien, and being sued before the state court of Oakland county, filed a petition at the first term to remove the cause into the circuit court of the United States. Bond was given, to which there was no objection, and it appeared that the matter in dispute exceeded the sum of five hundred dollars. The state court refused to permit the removal. This court held, that the requisites of the act of congress having been complied with in this case, the state court had no right to deny the removal. The law declares, that, under such'circumstances, the state court shall proceed no further in the case. And the supreme court have held, that all subsequent proceedings in the state court are coram non judice. [Gordon v. Longest] 16 Pet. [41 U. S.] 101. But in this case, the complainant dismissed his bill. This we suppose he had a right to do, whether the cause be considered in the state court, or in this court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Matthews v. Lyall, 16 F. Cas. 1113, 6 McLean 13 (circtdmi 1853).

16 F. Cas. 1113 (Matthews v. Lyall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. Abend
9 Ill. App. 304 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1881)
Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Horack
9 Ill. App. 309 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1881)
Sharp v. Gutcher
74 Ind. 357 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1881)
Lange v. . Benedict
73 N.Y. 12 (New York Court of Appeals, 1878)
Fisk v. Union Pacific Railroad
10 Abb. Pr. 457 (S.D. New York, 1871)