Matthews v. Hofmeister

124 A.D. 907

This text of 124 A.D. 907 (Matthews v. Hofmeister) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matthews v. Hofmeister, 124 A.D. 907 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1908).

Opinion

Plaintiff does not ask for specific performance. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with costs, upon the authority of Klim v. Sachs (102 App. Div. 44) and Krainin v. Coffey (119 id. 516). Woodward, Jenks, Gaynor, Rich and Miller, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Klim v. Sachs
102 A.D. 44 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1905)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
124 A.D. 907, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matthews-v-hofmeister-nyappdiv-1908.