Matthews v. Hofmeister

124 A.D. 907

Opinion

Plaintiff does not ask for specific performance. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with costs, upon the authority of Klim v. Sachs (102 App. Div. 44) and Krainin v. Coffey (119 id. 516). Woodward, Jenks, Gaynor, Rich and Miller, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Matthews v. Hofmeister, 124 A.D. 907 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1908).

124 A.D. 907 (Matthews v. Hofmeister) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Klim v. Sachs
102 A.D. 44 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1905)