Matthews v. Handley
361 U.S. 127, 80 S. Ct. 256
Opinion
MATTHEWS ET AL.
v.
HANDLEY, GOVERNOR OF INDIANA, ET AL.
Supreme Court of United States.
Edward V. Minczeski for appellants.
Edwin K. Steers, Attorney General of Indiana, and Lloyd C. Hutchinson, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Matthews v. Handley, 361 U.S. 127, 80 S. Ct. 256 (1959).
361 U.S. 127 (Matthews v. Handley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Madalyn Murray O'Hair and Society of Separationists, Inc. v. Mark White
675 F.2d 680 (Fifth Circuit, 1982)
Leftwich v. Leftwich
442 A.2d 139 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1982)
The People v. O'Neill
210 N.E.2d 526 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1965)
Hearne v. Smylie
225 F. Supp. 645 (D. Idaho, 1964)
Maryland Committee for Fair Representation v. Tawes, Governor & Board of State Canvassers
180 A.2d 656 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1962)
Baker v. Carr
369 U.S. 186 (Supreme Court, 1962)
W.M.C.A. Inc. v. Simon
196 F. Supp. 758 (S.D. New York, 1961)
West Towns Bus Co. v. Lau
361 U.S. 127 (Supreme Court, 1959)