Matthews v. Gittere

Opinion

1 2

3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA

5 * * *

6 IVAN LEE MATTHEWS, II, Case No. 3:19-cv-00217-MMD-WGC

7 Plaintiff, ORDER v. 8 WILLIAM GITTERE, et al.,

9 Defendants. 10 11 Pro se Plaintiff Ivan Matthews, II, filed a first amended civil rights complaint under 12 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF No. 10 (“FAC”).) Before the Court is the Report and 13 Recommendation (“R&R” or “Recommendation”) of United States Magistrate Judge 14 William G. Cobb (ECF No. 28), recommending that Defendants’ motion for summary 15 judgment (ECF No. 21) be granted. Matthews had until November 8, 2021, to file an 16 objection. To date, no objection to the R&R has been filed. For this reason, and as 17 explained below, the Court adopts Judge Cobb’s R&R and will grant Defendants’ motion 18 for summary judgment. 19 The Court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or 20 recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Where a party 21 fails to object to a magistrate judge’s recommendation, the Court is not required to 22 conduct “any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an objection.” Thomas 23 v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); see also United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 24 1116 (9th Cir. 2003) (“De novo review of the magistrate judges’ findings and 25 recommendations is required if, but only if, one or both parties file objections to the 26 findings and recommendations.”) (emphasis in original); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72, Advisory 27 Committee Notes (1983) (providing that the Court “need only satisfy itself that there is no 28 clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.”). 1 Because there is no objection, the Court need not conduct de novo review, and is 2 || satisfied Judge Cobb did not clearly err. Here, Judge Cobb recommends that Defendants’ 3 || motion for summary judgment be granted as Matthews failed to exhaust his administrative 4 || remedies. (ECF No. 28 at 4-5.) More specifically, Defendants are entitled to summary 5 || judgment as Matthews did not file any grievance about the alleged unsanitary conditions 6 || in the shower facility or the blood related issues he raises in his FAC. (/d.) The Court 7 || agrees with Judge Cobb. Having reviewed the R&R and the record in this case, the Court 8 || will adopt the R&R in full. 9 It is therefore ordered that Judge Cobb’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 10 || 28) is accepted and adopted in full. 11 It is further ordered that Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 21) 12 || is granted. 13 The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly and to close this case. 14 DATED THIS 15" Day of November 2021. 15 16 f{ Gh MIRANDA MDU 18 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28