Matthews v. Emery

32 A.D.2d 649, 301 N.Y.S.2d 435, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4030

This text of 32 A.D.2d 649 (Matthews v. Emery) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matthews v. Emery, 32 A.D.2d 649, 301 N.Y.S.2d 435, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4030 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

Opinion

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated April 29, 1968, modified, on the law and the facts, by deleting from the sixth decretal paragraph the words “ and an additional allowance of 5% as provided in Section 8303 of the CPLR”. As so modified, judgment affirmed, with costs to respondent against appellant. In our opinion, under the circumstances herein, the granting of an additional allowance under CPLR 8303 (subd. [a], par. 3) was an improvident exercise of discretion. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
32 A.D.2d 649, 301 N.Y.S.2d 435, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4030, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matthews-v-emery-nyappdiv-1969.