Matthews v. D'Arcy

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Matthews v. D'Arcy

664 N.E.2d 1193, 422 Mass. 1012, 1996 Mass. LEXIS 124

CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

DecidedMay 20, 1996

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 664 N.E.2d 1193 (Matthews v. D'Arcy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Matthews v. D'Arcy, 664 N.E.2d 1193, 422 Mass. 1012, 1996 Mass. LEXIS 124 (Mass. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

This is an appeal under S.J.C. Rule 2:21, 421 Mass. 1303 (1995), from a single justice’s denial of a petition for relief under G. L. c. 211, § 3 (1994 ed.). As this is a discovery matter in a civil trial, a petition for relief was available to a single justice of the Appeals Court under G. L. c. 231, § 118, first par. (1994 ed.). The single justice committed no error of law and did not abuse his discretion. His denial of the plaintiff’s request for relief is affirmed.

So ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This is an appeal under S.J.C. Rule 2:21, 421 Mass. 1303 (1995), from a single justice’s denial of a petition for relief under G. L. c. 211, § 3 (1994 ed.). As this is a discovery matter in a civil trial, a petition for relief was available to a single justice of the Appeals Court under G. L. c. 231, § 118, first par. (1994 ed.). The single justice committed no error of law and did not abuse his discretion. His denial of the plaintiff’s request for relief is affirmed.

So ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

664 N.E.2d 1193, 422 Mass. 1012, 1996 Mass. LEXIS 124, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matthews-v-darcy-mass-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack