Matthews v. City of Thomaston

94 S.E. 631, 21 Ga. App. 496, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 654
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided December 19, 1917·No. 9199·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Bboyi.es, P. J.

1. The petition for certiorari not affirmatively showing that the petitioner had given such a bond as is required by the statute (Acts 1902, p. 105, Park’s Ann. Code, § 5191 (a)), the court did not err in refusing to sanction the petition. Toliver v. Wrightsville, 17 Ga. App. 345 (86 S. E. 823); Hubert v. Thomasville, 18 Ga. App. 756 (90 S. E. 720); Gillespie v. Macon, 19 Ga. App. 1 (90 S. E. 970).

2. It is immaterial that the judge of the superior court based his refusal to sanction the petition for certiorari upon other grounds than the one referred to in the preceding note. He- reached the correct result, and his judgment is therefore affirmed. Memmler v. State, 75 Ga. 576 (1a) ; Kendricks v. Millen, 16 Ga. App. 273 (3) (85 S. E. 264); Flynn v. Hast Point, 18 Ga. App. 729 (90 S. E. 372).

Judgment affirmed.

Bloodioorth and Harwell, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Matthews v. City of Thomaston, 94 S.E. 631, 21 Ga. App. 496, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 654 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

94 S.E. 631 (Matthews v. City of Thomaston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Adams v. Overland-Madison Co.
109 S.E. 413 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1921)
Hines v. Porter
106 S.E. 16 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1921)