Matthews v. Belmar Laundry Co.

2 N.J. Misc. 428, 1924 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 165
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided May 26, 1924·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This suit ivas brought to recover damages for the negligent use by the defendant of a portable steam boiler. On December 22d, 1922, the plaintiff hired and took his boiler, which was mounted on wheels, to the defendant. It was taken from Marcloan, New Jersey, to Belmar, New Jersey. The trial resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff for $800. The defendant obtained a rule to show cause and writes down seven reasons for a new trial, all of which are without legal merit and do not call for any extended discussion. The admission of testimony challenged was proper. The fact that the boiler was operated without a license is not a defense or an excuse for negligence. Muller v. West Jersey and Seashore Railroad Co., 122 Atl. Rep. 693; Shaw v. Thielbahr, 82 N. J. L. 23.

The rule to show cause is discharged.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Matthews v. Belmar Laundry Co., 2 N.J. Misc. 428, 1924 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 165 (N.J. 1924).

2 N.J. Misc. 428 (Matthews v. Belmar Laundry Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Muller v. West Jersey & Seashore Railroad
122 A. 693 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1923)