Matthews v. Belmar Laundry Co.
This text of 2 N.J. Misc. 428 (Matthews v. Belmar Laundry Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This suit ivas brought to recover damages for the negligent use by the defendant of a portable steam boiler. On December 22d, 1922, the plaintiff hired and took his boiler, which was mounted on wheels, to the defendant. It was taken from Marcloan, New Jersey, to Belmar, New Jersey. The trial resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff for $800. The defendant obtained a rule to show cause and writes down seven reasons for a new trial, all of which are without legal merit and do not call for any extended discussion. The admission of testimony challenged was proper. The fact that the boiler was operated without a license is not a defense or an excuse for negligence. Muller v. West Jersey and Seashore Railroad Co., 122 Atl. Rep. 693; Shaw v. Thielbahr, 82 N. J. L. 23.
The rule to show cause is discharged.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 N.J. Misc. 428, 1924 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 165, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matthews-v-belmar-laundry-co-nj-1924.