Matthews, L. v. IVS Landscaping
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
LONNIE MATTHEWS, : No. 101 EM 2020 :
Petitioner :
: :
v. :
: :
PROSPECT CROZER, LLC., D/B/A : CROZER KEYSTONE HEALTH SYSTEM, : CROZER KEYSTONE HEALTH SYSTEM, : PROSPECT MEDICAL HOLDINGS, INC., : CKHS, INC., PROSPECT HEALTH : ACCESS NETWORK, D/B/A CROZER- : KEYSTONE HEALTH NETWORK D/B/A : FAMILY PHYSICIANS AT GARRETT : ROAD, IVS LANDSCAPING, LTD., AND : ANTHONY'S LANDSCAPING AND TREE : SERVICE CO., :
:
Respondents
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 19th day of March, 2021, the Petition for Leave to File Petition for
Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Matthews, L. v. IVS Landscaping (Matthews, L. v. IVS Landscaping) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.