Matthews Industrial Piping Co. v. Mobil Oil Corp.

114 A.D.2d 772, 495 N.Y.S.2d 35, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 53785
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 14, 1985·Published·Cited by 16 cases

Opinion

—Order of the Supreme Court, Bronx County (David Levy, J.), entered on or about March 21, 1985, which, upon renewal by defendant of its motion and cross motion pursuant to the court’s prior decision of July 11, 1984, inter alia, directed plaintiff to produce income tax returns, financial statements and cash disbursement ledgers, is unanimously modified, on the law and on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, to the extent of striking the direction that plaintiff produce income tax returns in response to the notice for discovery and inspection, and otherwise affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The disclosure of tax returns is disfavored due to their confidential and private nature. Consequently, a party seeking to compel their production must make a strong showing of overriding necessity. An examination of the record herein does not indicate that defendant has sufficiently demonstrated that the information contained in plaintiff’s tax returns is indispensable to the instant litigation and unavailable from other sources. (Briton v Knott Hotels Corp., 1ll AD2d 62.) Concur—Murphy, P. J., Carro, Lynch and Milonas, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Matthews Industrial Piping Co. v. Mobil Oil Corp., 114 A.D.2d 772, 495 N.Y.S.2d 35, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 53785 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

114 A.D.2d 772 (Matthews Industrial Piping Co. v. Mobil Oil Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Etage Real Estate LLC v. Stern
2025 NY Slip Op 06897 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)
Lichtman v. Gibbons
30 A.D.3d 319 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Justyk v. Treibacher Schleifmittel Corp.
4 A.D.3d 882 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Xamaka, Inc. v. 166 East 61st Street Corp.
277 A.D.2d 35 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Four Aces Jewelry Corp. v. Smith
256 A.D.2d 42 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Slutzky v. Aron Estates Corp.
157 Misc. 2d 749 (New York Supreme Court, 1993)
Gordon v. Grossman
183 A.D.2d 669 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
Gray v. Pashkow
168 A.D.2d 849 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Grossman v. Lacoff
168 A.D.2d 484 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Aetna Insurance v. Mirisola
167 A.D.2d 270 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Editel v. Liberty Studios, Inc.
162 A.D.2d 345 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Roth v. American Colonial Insurance
159 A.D.2d 370 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Consentino v. Schwartz
155 A.D.2d 640 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Spancrete Northeast, Inc. v. Elite Associates, Inc.
148 A.D.2d 694 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Muller v. Sorensen
138 A.D.2d 683 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)