Matthews, Gary Evan v. State

Opinion

MO. _

Xti THE COUftX OF CfilWIrfAL Mms DP "PCXAS

JUO. /G- i$~60Ml-Cl ZtJ TW£ CaulT 6F APPALS fod 7^1 70JTH SoPUfcr^ SODiClAt D*STfccT OP TEX A3 AT tOWlO

MO. P/6739

&A(W £v//V-i /WtTW£fcl5,

V-

Ami! leu.

/noTlOiO TO .SOSPCMD T. g-.A.P. l3(V)

7& 7#£ ^0/vlO(JLA6i-e TU5T/GCS 0£ fWe flOvJftT of fi£jw*s>AL Afl>£ALSt . ^OM£S /OOJ (SA^V £v/A/0 /WAtrWCfcO^ Appeal prt.se, o.^J cesf*Jr- A/ll^ Mcju^d £kr* fi^crJok Cerur\: h> Suspend £Lk ?.3(b).s£ d* TeKeo /2dfes 0£ /?|^*iLifce Procedure. £j Support^ Appe.(la*»4 i^icu^ s/^i #ve A^- /otO,'Aj, 0"

X.

Qp ^c 7a er^er ex. pta-tac^M /Wo-ch^e or D^-^c^pM, ser- V^eo> O^jcI f>es oP hs Arc se p«M^ X

lAUmfM, Premise 6>As(D£, AppetU>> pr^s &vj3 /-^mik flrurt (Mill GfcAMT gxrs fl^-b^ W Sosfe*** te.A.P. 7V3(b) £MoJ oJicui AppelL^I ^6 Ale l^e op-Jv^l pe+:-tur^ £o>;Vk £er4riCW-4e Op Service,

/$>/ /^'

96.0/ Spar £?/ APPOINT", P&> S£

le&TfP'/CArC OP S£ftv/reg

X ^^er- cMc^er pe^cJb-) ot- jUerjor^ £j>«4 tn>e. Copers oC fc^e Air^M/^ /V1ii4^^i hir £/4«.osroM ol- T.^-e. ^ PWe Pc& Se. Pet^la^

3a^cc —&rrecta*JeJ Xjsrfj-iu^/^S D^fS'o^i Oaj 6kis 6^e 3/ ,sfc cU^

M S. 6u^/o, Su/U 4*1 &uJm<\} X->yfk,e Ce*j4er £iebu^e, 7eX*o 76033

5, Appellc^, pr* se

J, £*/^ £v^ rVUtke-is> TDC5-CXD4 0I8SSA7Q, be»^ pres- 6o4rfu fVsscweerc^J /'c^>s &e- po^t/w.e.o4 o^ CrJ/s/u.ocU CSuj-fjce ~ Correcrj^cJ X*js4-;4o£>gms D^f-s.*^ *ki A>4£er ^jumL 7e*e^$ . \/er>K« a^d c'eci^re u»4^.MeAj4^ d^*- ^Ax. o^id &>/YeeK

/s/A^ti AppeUe^i, pro. 5