Matthews (Felton) v. Warden
This text of Matthews (Felton) v. Warden (Matthews (Felton) v. Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
250 (1984); see also Hargrove v. State, 100 Nev. 498, 502-03, 686 P.2d 222, 225 (1984). Further, to the extent appellant claimed a due process violation in the prison appeals process, an institutional appeal is not a protected due process right. See Sandin v. Conner, 515 U.S. 472, 486 (1995). Accordingly, we ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 3
Arl-A J. Hardesty
J. Douglas
J.
cc: Hon. Gary Fairman, District Judge Felton L. Matthews, Jr. Attorney General/Carson City Attorney General/Ely White Pine County Clerk
3 We have reviewed all documents that appellant has submitted in proper person to the clerk of this court in this matter, and we conclude that no relief based upon those submissions is warranted. To the extent that appellant has attempted to present claims or facts in those submissions which were not previously presented in the proceedings below, we have declined to consider them in the first instance.
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Matthews (Felton) v. Warden, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matthews-felton-v-warden-nev-2014.