Matthew Riddle v. the State of Texas
This text of Matthew Riddle v. the State of Texas (Matthew Riddle v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
No. 06-25-00090-CR
MATTHEW RIDDLE, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 202nd District Court Bowie County, Texas Trial Court No. 24F0360-202
Before Stevens, C.J., van Cleef and Rambin, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Rambin MEMORANDUM OPINION
A Bowie County jury convicted Matthew Riddle of online solicitation of a minor and
assessed a punishment of twenty years’ imprisonment with a $10,000.00 fine. See TEX. PENAL
CODE ANN. § 33.021 (Supp.).
Riddle’s appeal in this case raises the same issue raised in his appeal from 06-25-00088-
CR. Specifically, Riddle argues that he was also convicted for child grooming under Section
15.032 of the Texas Penal Code and that his indictment in this case should be dismissed because
Section 33.021 “cannot be applied simultaneously.” See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 15.032
(Supp.). For the same reasons stated in our opinion in 06-25-0088-CR, we overrule Riddle’s
point of error as inadequately briefed.
We affirm the trial court’s judgment.
Jeff Rambin Justice
Date Submitted: January 29, 2026 Date Decided: January 30, 2026
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Matthew Riddle v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matthew-riddle-v-the-state-of-texas-txctapp6-2026.