Matthew Paul Zaleck v. Lawrence E. Wilson, Warden San Quentin Prison

365 F.2d 831, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 5009
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 12, 1966
Docket20456
StatusPublished

This text of 365 F.2d 831 (Matthew Paul Zaleck v. Lawrence E. Wilson, Warden San Quentin Prison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matthew Paul Zaleck v. Lawrence E. Wilson, Warden San Quentin Prison, 365 F.2d 831, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 5009 (9th Cir. 1966).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Johnson v. State of New Jersey, 384 U.S. 719, 86 S.Ct. 1772, 16 L.Ed.2d 882 requires rejection of appellant’s contention that the rule of Escobedo v. State of Illinois, 378 U.S. 478, 84 S.Ct. 1758, 12 L.Ed.2d 977, should be applied retroactively to his in-custody interrogation.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Escobedo v. Illinois
378 U.S. 478 (Supreme Court, 1964)
Johnson v. New Jersey
384 U.S. 719 (Supreme Court, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
365 F.2d 831, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 5009, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matthew-paul-zaleck-v-lawrence-e-wilson-warden-san-quentin-prison-ca9-1966.